Inputs
The agreed workflow, application context, business requirements and assessment scope.
AGMIO ARGUS · Vulnerability assessment
Understand what could
go wrong. Before release.
Test agentic workflows against adversarial scenarios informed by your application and business requirements.
Assessment
Threat scenarios and test prompts generated using frontier models or AGMIO’s customized model.
Outputs
Findings mapped to relevant frameworks, with proposed policies and guardrails to inform remediation.
Designed around the workflow
From assessment to action
A finding is useful when it helps a team decide what to change. ARGUS connects vulnerability assessment to the policies and guardrails the workflow needs. Review findings in context, prioritize remediation and retest the affected behavior.
Explore the related solutionAn illustrative evaluation
Follow a finding to a control.
A sample review scenario, not a product result or customer record.
- 01
Scoped workflow
An account-review agent can read records but must not update them.
- 02
Test scenario
Untrusted content attempts to redirect the agent into a record-update tool call.
- 03
Evidence to inspect
The request, attempted operation and observed result show whether the boundary held.
- 04
Control to evaluate
Constrain tool permissions and retest the workflow after the proposed change.
A few useful answers
Before you
take the next step.
What is evaluated?
The selected agentic application and its workflow, within an authorized scope. The pilot defines the tools, data boundaries, test conditions and evidence needed to evaluate the result.
What should we bring to a demo?
A description of the agent’s purpose, the tools it can call, the people it acts for and the risk you want to evaluate. You do not need to send confidential data to start the conversation.
Make your next agent a considered decision.
See ARGUS in the context
of your workflow.
Discuss the controls, evaluation scope and evidence your team needs.